When it comes to fishing big water for big trout, tenkara has traditionally been the odd man out. We've all heard the argument, "tenkara was never meant for large fish. In Japan, a large ______ (insert Iwana, Yamame, Amago) is 40 cm (15.8 inches)". Pursuing these "large" salmonids is the realm of the Shaku hunter. In order to successfully be considered a Shaku Hunter, one must catch one of these fish that measures over 30.3 cm, a task that to some may never be accomplished. (Ref. 1)
But soon after tenkara arrived in America, folks started trying to catch the largest trout that they could using tenkara rods and gear. Rods were breaking right and left, and tenkara was getting laughed at by traditional fly fishers as a tool meant for children chasing small trout.
Then along came some pioneers. You know them, Brent Auger, Karin Miller, Rob Worthing, Eric Ostrander, and others. These tenkara anglers refused to stick with small trout; they went for much larger fish than tenkara was intended. But early on, the tools to tackle large trout didn't readily exist. Tenkara USA came out with the Amago, and Chris Stewart imported the Daiwa Enshou LT44S-F and some keiryu rods (most of which had light tippet ratings), but these few 4+ meter rods didn't always answer the needs of these "American Shaku Hunters".
Nowadays, the tenkara angler who wants to fish large water for large trout has many choices. What a world we live in! But many people have questions regarding these long sticks, such as can they be cast one handed and how heavy do they feel? Well, even though I'm not a Shaku hunter, and prefer catching trout smaller than 16 inches, I thought I'd put together some data for the tenkara community regarding the rotational moment (or torque) of these large tenkara rods.
Just as a reminder, rotational moment is a mathematical tool used to estimate the tip heaviness of a rod. This measurement has been validated and used by Gamakatsu, a premium quality Japanese rod maker. I've written about Moment of Inertia and Swing Weight in the past, but these are harder to calculate, and since Gamakatsu has already accepted rotational moment as a measurement for their rods, I decided just to stick with it.
The rotational moment of a rod is calculated by measuring its weight in kilograms and multiplying that by its center of gravity distance in centimeters from the butt of the rod, when the rod is fully extended. Any number over 6 and the rod begins to feel tip heavy, over 7 and you'll definitely notice. Simply put, the larger the number, the more tip heavy the rod will feel. Likewise, the larger the number, the more stress on your forearm and more chance of micro-tears being induced in the extensor tendons with repeated use (think tennis elbow, ouch!). Moment of inertia is likely a better mathematical model, but it's also more complicated, so rotational moment (RM) makes sense to be the mathematical tool of choice.
I put together a spreadsheet of the currently available tenkara rods advertised to be four meters (13' 1.5") or longer that I've used (or know of) and some of their measurements, including their RM. I might have missed one or two rods, but I think I got most of them (I'm sure I'll hear about any I missed). Now before you say, "what about the Suntech _____, or the Daiwa ______, or the Keiryu Rod Co. ______, let me remind you that this chart is about 4+ meter tenkara rods, not keiryu or seiryu rods. I did include one keiryu rod, the Diawa Kiyose 43M-F, because it's commonly thought of as a "big fish" rod and so many people have one. Besides, it's my chart, and I wanted to include it. I also chose to include the Nissin Zerosum Oni Honryu 395, although it's advertised as a 395 cm rod. It measures nearly 4 meters in length, and so it bears inclusion. Of the rods in the chart with missing data, if you have one of them and would like to contribute data, please contact me (use the contact me form at the top right of this page)!
So, here's the data. I pass no judgment or opinion on any of these rods; I only present the data. I include the Oni Type-I and Tanuki XL-1 for reference, but they are not considered "big fish" rods. BTW, I placed a new tab called Rotational Moment Chart on the Tab Bar of the Teton Tenkara homepage and will update the chart as needed.
For the updated chart, click HERE to ask for the link. Here are some screenshots of the current chart (RFI is the Rod Flex Index):
Conclusion: So, what to do with this data? I don't know. I'll let you decide if it helps you when you're researching 4 meter and longer tenkara rods for larger fish. Maybe you'll find it helpful, maybe not. But at least the data's now out there for the tenkara community to peruse. Use it (or ignore it) as you will! And remember, not all 4+ meter rods are designed to be equal. An Oni Type-II may have the lowest rotational moment, but it won't take down a salmon like the Zen Taka will! So, it goes without saying, when targeting large fish, don't bring a knife to a gun fight! (Ref. 2)
Acknowledgments: I'd like to thank a few people for their help in getting data for rods I didn't have on hand. In alphabetical order: Amanda Hoffner = TUSA Ito, August Gresens = TUSA Ito, Chris Cameron = Anglo & Co. Wasabi 40, David Noll = Shimano BG Tenkara 48NV, John Vetterli = Oni Type-II, Karin Miller = Zen Tenkara Taka, Kris Franqui = Daiwa Expert LT H44, Nick Feller = TRC Rocky, Paul Vertrees = Zen Tenkara Sagi, Tom Bayly = TAO Wisco 2 (he actually sent me one to measure. Thanks, Tom!). I'd also like to thank Karin Miller who reminded me that just because you have a long and powerful tenkara rod, you still have to use correct technique to properly play and land large fish. It takes finely honed skills, not just a rod with some numbers.
Disclaimer: All rods and production runs have slight variations in weight and length. These data may vary slightly from rods from different production runs.
Question: what are these "honed skills"? What is "correct technique"? Since we are talking about long powerful tenkara rods, this is most likely fishing in the mainstream. Fishing in the mainstream of the river is considered difficult as it is difficult to find fishing spots. In fact, it would be more accurate to say that it is difficult to choose points for fishing. Inside the main course of the river there are streams in which fish feed. But ... if the river is wide enough, there are too many such flows in the water column. I know fishermen who have been unable to catch grayling for almost years due to the fact that they cannot “read” these internal currents in the water column. In this sense, indeed, the rod itself without the skill of reading the river does not matter.ReplyDelete
Here's a start: https://youtu.be/br_nRWo5TDMDelete
Thanks for your work on that Tom. As a self-proclaimed nerd, I enjoy it!ReplyDelete
Thanks, Kris. I thought you might find the results interesting.Delete
Great videos for beginners! BUT ... pay attention, they have everything - casting, playing fish, classification of mountain river flows, etc. , - and there are absolutely no detailed recommendations for finding parking lots on a full-flowing river (main stream). This is what I'm talking about: in my fifteen years of experience fishing tenkara, keiryu and fly fishing, this is the main issue, not the length of the rodReplyDelete
Really good job!ReplyDelete
Usually I prefer a longer rod but the 'rotational moment' (the torque by the gravity) is always the problem.
I think that all the companies should provide data on 'Rotational Moment' of thieir rods -- the mere weight data is not enough because it includes the weight of the grip.
By the way, have you ever considered the rod from Nissin: 'Zerosum Hatsu-ume' of 3.96m length? It weighs only 33g!!
I am really wondering if this rod can beat the Oni Type-II.